Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate the geopolitical differences in the Persian Gulf region. Today, the Persian Gulf is known as one of the most important geopolitical areas in the world. The geo-economic importance of the region due to the existence of energy resources, good communication position and geopolitical structure of the region has led to historical and civilizational differences between the countries of the region as well as differences between trans-regional countries in relations with countries.
Method: The method of this research is "applied" in terms of purpose and "descriptive-analytical" in terms of nature. Using John Coliner's theory, which focuses on geopolitical differences, this study seeks to answer the question of what factors and components lead to geopolitical differences in the Persian Gulf region?
Results: The findings of the study indicate geopolitical differences in the Persian Gulf region in the dimensions of territorial disputes (claims and disputes over borders, land and maritime territories), strategic disputes (disputes between countries over strategic places and points such as Arvand River, Abu Musa and the Strait of Hormuz), economic disputes (disputes over energy resources and common offshore fields), environmental disputes (disputes over the marine environment and water scarcity in the region) and cultural disputes (historical-civilizational disputes and Ethnicity) which has led to competition and geopolitical tensions in the relations of the countries of the region and the involvement of supra-regional powers in the Persian Gulf region.
Conclusion: The results of the study indicate the geopolitical differences between the countries of the Persian Gulf region include five dimensions: "territorial, economic, strategic, cultural and environmental". The most important consequences of these differences are "failure to form a comprehensive regional organization", "lack of collective security approach", "First and Second Persian Gulf Wars", "geopolitical rivalries" and "proxy wars" are present.
Al-Zahrani, Khodran H. and M. B. Baig. (2011), “Water In The Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia: Sustainable Management Options”, The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, Vol.21, No.3.
C.S. Gray (2013), Perspectives on Strategy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p 125 .
Collins. John M (1998), Military Geography: For Professionals and the Public . Department for communities and local Government. London.
Fadlelmawla, A., M. Al-Otaibi (2005), “Analysis of the Water Resources Status in Kuwait”, Water Resources Management.Vol.19.No.5: 555-570.
J.J. Grygiel (2016), Great Powers and Geopolitical Change, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
James E. Dougherty and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff (1981), Contending Theories of International Relations. publisher: Longman Higher Education.
Karimipour, Yadollah (2000), "Iran and its Neighbors: Sources of Threat and Tension", Tarbiat Moallem University Jihad Publications .(in Persian).
Kennedy, Paul (2013), "The world until 2025", translated by Abbas Mokhber, Tehran: New plan .(in Persian).
Lehane, Sinéad (2014), “The Iranian Water Crisis”, Future Directions International, Available at: < http://www.futuredirections.org.
Mojtahed-Zadeh, Pirouz & Bahador Zarei (2017), Maritime Boundary Delimitations in the Persian Gulf, International Studies Journal (ISJ) , Vol. 14 , No.2 , fall 2017 , pp.49-66.
Rabiee, Hossein and Musa Sadeghi (2011), "Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges of Iran's Political Geography in the Persian Gulf in the 21st Century", Proceedings of the 10th Persian Gulf National Scientific-Research Conference.(in persian).
Rahimpour, Ali (2010), "Persian Gulf Security and Iran's Strategic Position", Human Geography Quarterly, Third Year, First Issue.(in Persian).
Rashed, dina (2019). Geography, Resources and the Geopolitics of Middle East Conflicts, https://www.e-ir.info/2019/05/24/geography-resources-and-the-geopolitics-of-middle-east-conflicts/.
Sloan, G. (2017) Geopolitics, geography and strategic history. Geopolitical Theory. Routledge, Abingdon, UK, pp272.
www. Fao2020.org
www.bp.com /statistical review 2018.
www.Britanicca2021.com
www.pewresearch2020.org
www.pewresearch2020.org
)