• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Political studies of Islamic world

  1. Home
  2. The Impact of Political Opportunity Structures on the Fate of Islamist Movements in Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of Iran and Egypt

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

cost

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Forms

Guide for Authors

The Impact of Political Opportunity Structures on the Fate of Islamist Movements in Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of Iran and Egypt

    Authors

    • Kamran Geshnizjani 1
    • Ali Mohammad Hazeri 2

    1 Sociology Department, Humanities Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University

    2 Dean of Sociology Department, Humanities Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University

,

Document Type : Research Paper

10.30479/psiw.2020.13496.2818
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Objective. After decades of social and political activities, the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood succeeded in establishing “the largest Islamic movement of the twentieth century” with hundreds of thousands members throughout Egypt. However, in despite of political achievements such as winning the 2012 Presidential Election, they lost political power by a coup-revolution at the end of the 2011-2013 revolutionary period. In contrast, the Islamist movement of the combatant clergies succeeded in achieving dominance in the Iranian 1977-79 Revolution and seizing power in the post-revolutionary political system. The objective of this article is to explain, from a structural perspective, the historical contexts which make such distinct situations possible for the Islamist movements in Iran and Egypt.
Method. This article is in the tradition of comparative-historical studies of revolutions and uses the concept of “political opportunity structures” to explain the success and failure of the Islamist movements in these revolutions.
Results. The main differences regarding the political opportunity structure for the Islamist movements in the Iranian and Egyptian revolutions are: more intense conflicts between the clergy and the non-clergy Islamic-political activists in Egypt made the accumulation of resources in a united Islamic front more difficult; more armed forces autonomy from the head of the state in Egypt strengthened the possibility of their surviving as a structural barrier against the success of the Islamists in revolution; and in a stark contrast to Iran, Egypt observed a retreat from state secularism in the decades leading up to the revolution, which, along with the benefits of the Islamic institutions from government budgets, increased the political influence and satisfaction of the conservative Islam, and, consequently, weakened the possibility of the combatant Islamists to gain dominance during the revolution.
Conclusion. Aside from the cultural, cognitive and agency factors mentioned in the existing literature, the structure of political opportunity was more favorable to the success of the Islamist movement in the Iranian revolution than in the Egyptian one.
 

Keywords

  • Islamist Movement
  • Revolution
  • Political Opportunity Structure
  • Combatant Clergies
  • Muslim Brotherhood
  • XML
  • PDF 589.65 K
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
1.   Abrahamian E. (1982). Iran between Two Revolutions, Translated by A. Golmohammadi & M.E. Fatahi, Tehran, Ney Publication (In Persian).
2.Abul-Magd Z. (2017). Militarizing the Nation: The Army, Business, and Revolution in Egypt: Columbia University Press.
3.Akhavi S. (1980). Religion and Politics in Contemporary Iran: SUNY Press.
4.Arjomand SA. (1981). Shi'ite Islam and the Revolution in Iran. Government and Opposition 16: 293-316.
5.Arjomand SA. (1988). The Turban for the Crown: The Islamic Revolution in Iran: Studies in Middle Eastern History.
6.Appleby, R.S. and Marty, M.E., (1996). Fundamentalisms and the State: Remaking Polities, Economies, and Militance.
7.Azimi, R. (1991). Oral History, Foundation For Iranian Studies, Available at:
8.https://fis-iran.org/en/oralhistory
9.Barraclough, S., (1998). Al-Azhar: Between the Government and the Islamists. The Middle East Journal, 236-249.
10.  Bayat A. (1998). Revolution without Movement, Movement without Revolution: Comparing Islamic activism in Iran and Egypt. Comparative Studies in Society and History 40: 136-169.
11.  Bayat A. (2013). Egypt and its Unsettled Islamism. Post-Islamism: The Changing Faces of Political Islam: 185-228.
12.  Brown NJ. (2011). Post-revolutionary al-Azhar: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Washington, DC.
13.  Cooper MN. (1982). The Demilitarization of the Egyptian Cabinet. International Journal of Middle East Studies 14: 203-225.
14.  Dara, J., & Karami, M. (2015). Comparative Analysis of the Islamic Revolution of Iran and the Egyptian 2011 Revolution in Light of Study of Clergy and Muslim Brotherhood Streams. Strategic Research of Politics, 14(4), 41-69 (in Persian).
15.  Dehghani Firoozabadi S.J & Ajorlu, H. (2013). A Comparative Analysis of Leadership in Iranian Islamic Revolution and Egptian Revolution, The Islamic Revolution Approach, 24: 3-22 (In Persian).
16.  Dodge B. (1974). Al-Azhar: A Millennium of Muslim Learning: Middle East Institute.
17.  Domanlou ,T., Moghaddamshad, M. R., & Feirahi, D. (2014). Democracy or Authoritarianism: Political Failure of the Muslim Brotherhood. Quarterly Journal of Political Research in Islamic World, 4(1), 28-53 (in Persian).
18.  Dorakhshah, J., & Harati, M. J. (2013). Comparative Study of Influence of Revolutionary Discontent on Future System Building of Revolutions in Iran and Egypt. Political Knowledge.9(1),5-18 (in Persian).
19.  Ebrahimi, H. (2014). The Relationship between the Islamic Revolution and the Islamic Awakening (Tunisia & Egypt). Doctoral Thesis in Political Science, Allameh Tabatabaei University (in Persian).
20.  Faramarzi, F. (2012). Religion in Epoch of the Second Pahlavi (1941-1979). Tehran: Elm Publication (in Persian).
21.  Feirahi, D., & Askari Sadr, A. (2019). The Reasons of Ekhvan ol- Moslemin’s Failure After the Downfall of Mubarak. Political Science, 82(21), 99-126 (in Persian).
22.  Fischer MM. (2003). Iran: From Religious Dispute to Revolution: University of Wisconsin Press.
23.  Gharabaghi, A. (1986). Confessions of the General: Memories of General Abbas Gharabaghi. Tehran: Ney Publication (in Persian).
24.  Goodwin J. (2005). Revolutions and Revolutionary Movements. The Handbook of Political Sociology. Cambridge University Press, 404-422.
25.  Habibolahi, K. (1984). Iranian Oral History Project. Harvard University. Available at: https://library.harvard.edu/collections/iranian-oral-history-project
26.  Haji Naseri, S., & Tavakolian, M. (2019). From Revolution to Refolution (Investigating the Reasons for Egypt's 2011 Uprising Failure). Journal of Political Sociology of Islamic World, 13(6), 171-196 (in Persian).
27.  Harati, M. J., & Zafari, M. (2014). The Difference of Army Role in Iran Islamic Revolution Process and Egypt 2011 Developments. Research Journal of Islamic Revolution, 8(3), 139-155 (in Persian).
28.  Hatina M. (2010). 'Ulama', politics, and the Public Sphere: An Egyptian Perspective: University of Utah Press.
29.  Hazeri, A. M. (1998). The Development Process of the Ideology of the Islamic Revolution. Matin, 1, 107-157.
30.  Jafarian, R. (2011). Religious- Political Organizations and Currents in Iran. Tehran: Elm Publication.
31.  Jahangir K. & Esmaeili M. (2013). The Impact of Islamic Revolution of Iran on Islamic Awakening in North Africa (2010-2012): The Case Study of Tunisia, Egypt and Lybia. Politics Quarterly. 43 (1), 27-53 (In Persian).
32.  Jan Michiel O. (2010). Sharia Incorporated. A Comparative Overview of the Legal Systems of Twelve Muslim Countries in Past and Present: Leiden University Press.
33.  Jenkins JC and Form W. (2005). Social Movements and Social Change.
34.  Kepel, G. (1985). Muslim, Extremism in Egypt: The Prophet and Pharaoh, Translated by H. Ahmadi. Tehran: Keyhan Publication (in Persian).
35.  Khorramshad, M. B. (2013). Islamic Revolution, Islamic Awakening and Modern Islamic Civilization. Strategy for Culture, 23(6), 127-154 (in Persian).
36.  Kurzman C. (2019). Sociologies of Islam. Annual Review of Sociology 45: 265-277.
37.  Lia, B. (2009). The Society of the Muslim Brothers in Egypt: The Rise of an Islamic Mass Movement, 1928 – 1942. Translated By A. Farrahi. Tehran: Research Center for Islamic History (in Persian).
38.  Lotfian, S. (2001). Army and the Iranian Islamic Revolution. Tehran: Islamic Revolution Documents Center.
39.  Malaekeh, S. H.,& Hoseini, S. M. A. (2016). The Causes of the Defeat of the Muslim Brotherhood in Establishing a Durable Government in Egypt, International and Political Research, 26(8), 57-84 (in Persian).
40.  Mansoori, J. (2008). The History of 15 Khordad in Documents. Tehran: Islamic Revolution Document Center (in Persian).
41.  McAdam D, McCarthy JD, Zald MN, et al. (1996). Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings: Cambridge University Press.
42.  Mellor N. (2017). Voice of the Muslim Brotherhood: Da'wa, Discourse, and Political Communication: Routledge.
43.  Meyer DS and Minkoff DC. (2004). Conceptualizing Political Opportunity. Social Forces 82: 1457-1492.
44.  Mir-Hosseini Z. (2010). Sharia and National Law in Iran. SHARIA INCORPORATED: 319.
45.  Mirsepassi-Ashtiani A. (1994). The Crisis of Secular Politics and the Rise of Political Islam in Iran. Social Text: 51-84.
46.  Moaddel M. (1993). Class, politics, and ideology in the Iranian revolution: Columbia University Press.
47.  Moazami B. (2009). The Islamization of the Social Movements and the Revolution, 1963–1979. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 29: 47-62.
48.  Moustafa T. (2000). Conflict and Cooperation between the State and Religious Institutions in Contemporary Egypt. International Journal of Middle East Studies 32: 3-22.
49.  Nabavi, N. (2003). Intellectuals and the State in Iran: Discourse and the Dilemma of Authenticity, Translated by H. Fesharaki. Tehran: Shirazeh Publication (in Persian).
50.  Parsa M. (1989) Social Origins of the Iranian Revolution: Rutgers University Press.
51.  Parsa M. (2000). States, Ideologies, and Social Revolutions: A comparative Analysis of Iran, Nicaragua, and the Philippines: Cambridge University Press.
52.  People's Mujahedin of Iran. (1981). How To Learn the Quran. V.2 (In Persian).
53.  Pioppi D. (2013). Playing with fire. The Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian Leviathan. The International Spectator 48: 51-68.
54.  Shojaeizand, A. R. (2003). Revolutionary Period in Iran.Tehran: Orooj Publication (in Persian).
55.  Skocpol T. (1982). Rentier State and Shi'a Islam in the Iranian Revolution. Theory and Society 11: 265-283.
56.  Tabatabaei, S. H. (2018). Faqihs and Iranian Revolution. Tehran: Kavir Publication (in Persian).
57.  Toufanian, H. (1985). Iranian Oral History Project. Harvard University. Available at:https://library.harvard.edu/collections/iranian-oral-history-project
58.  Tilly C. (2004). Foreword. In: Islamic Activism: A Social Movement Theory Approach: Indiana University Press.
59.  Trager E. (2016). Arab Fall: How the Muslim Brotherhood Won and Lost Egypt in 891 Days: Georgetown University Press.
60.  Wickham CR. (2002). Mobilizing Islam: Religion, Activism, and Political Change in Egypt: Columbia University Press.
61.  Zahid M. (2010). Muslim Brotherhood and Egypt's Succession Crisis: The Politics of Liberalisation and Reform in the Middle East: IB Tauris.
62.  Zeghal, M., (1999). Religion and politics in Egypt: The Ulema of al-Azhar, Radical Islam, and the State (1952–94). International Journal of Middle East Studies, 31(3), 371-399.
    • Article View: 763
    • PDF Download: 582
Political studies of Islamic world
Volume 9, Issue 3 - Serial Number 35
November 2020
Pages 97-121
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 589.65 K
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 763
  • PDF Download: 582

APA

Geshnizjani, K. and Hazeri, A. M. (2020). The Impact of Political Opportunity Structures on the Fate of Islamist Movements in Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of Iran and Egypt. Political studies of Islamic world, 9(3), 97-121. doi: 10.30479/psiw.2020.13496.2818

MLA

Geshnizjani, K. , and Hazeri, A. M. . "The Impact of Political Opportunity Structures on the Fate of Islamist Movements in Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of Iran and Egypt", Political studies of Islamic world, 9, 3, 2020, 97-121. doi: 10.30479/psiw.2020.13496.2818

HARVARD

Geshnizjani, K., Hazeri, A. M. (2020). 'The Impact of Political Opportunity Structures on the Fate of Islamist Movements in Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of Iran and Egypt', Political studies of Islamic world, 9(3), pp. 97-121. doi: 10.30479/psiw.2020.13496.2818

CHICAGO

K. Geshnizjani and A. M. Hazeri, "The Impact of Political Opportunity Structures on the Fate of Islamist Movements in Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of Iran and Egypt," Political studies of Islamic world, 9 3 (2020): 97-121, doi: 10.30479/psiw.2020.13496.2818

VANCOUVER

Geshnizjani, K., Hazeri, A. M. The Impact of Political Opportunity Structures on the Fate of Islamist Movements in Revolution: A Comparative Analysis of Iran and Egypt. Political studies of Islamic world, 2020; 9(3): 97-121. doi: 10.30479/psiw.2020.13496.2818

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

 

   The Political Studies of Islamic World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC) .

 

 

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb