• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Political studies of Islamic world

  1. Home
  2. A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Turkey and Saudi Arabia in the Growth of Takfiri Extremism in Central Asia after 1991

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

cost

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Forms

Guide for Authors

A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Turkey and Saudi Arabia in the Growth of Takfiri Extremism in Central Asia after 1991

    Authors

    • Mohamadali Mirali 1
    • Amanollah Shafaee 2

    1 Associate Professor of Political Science, Al-Mustafa International University, Qom, Iran(Corresponding Author)alimir124@gmail.com

    2 Ph.D. Student in Political Science, Al-Mustafa International University, Qom, Iran

,

Document Type : Research Paper

10.30479/psiw.2020.12326.2693
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Objective: This article intends to examine the role of the Republic of Turkey with secular ideology and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with Wahhabi ideology in the production and intensification of Takfiri extremism in Central Asia after the collapse of the Soviet Union in the post-1991.
Method: The research method of the present article is descriptive-analytical and the study of the subject is comparative in the framework of the theory of "security complex" of Bari Bouzan. The necessary information has been collected using the library method and by referring to books, articles, and domestic and foreign publications.
Results: The findings show that the competitive polarity of Turkey and Saudi Arabia has manifested itself in different ways in Central Asia. The Turks have promoted Gulenism within the framework of Pan-Turkism, and the Saudis have spread Wahhabi ideology in the region within the framework of public diplomacy.
Conclusion: Central Asia, as a security complex after the collapse of the Soviet Union, has been exposed to the competition of major regional powers, and these powers have been effective in various ways in securing the region. Turkey and Saudi Arabia, as two major poles of the Islamic world, have provoked the fault lines of fundamentalism in this region and have seen their interests in fueling extremism. The ideological competition between the two countries has made a difference in role, level, purpose, strategy and fruit. Although the Turks and Saudis have acted differently, their work has been similar in intensifying Takfiri extremism in Central Asia.

Keywords

  • Turkey
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Takfiri Extremism
  • Central Asia
  • Wahhabism
  • Gulenism
  • XML
  • PDF 739.18 K
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
References
1.AbolHassan Shirazi, Habibollah (2005). Continuity of the authoritarian system in Central Asia. Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, (67): 1-26.(in Persian)
2.Agha Bakhshi, Afsharirad. (2004). Mino, Culture of Political Science. Tehran: Chapar.(in Persian)
3.Ahmadi, Hamid (2009). Turkey and Pan-Turkism in Central Asia. Central Asian Studies, (5): 1-22.(in Persian)
4.Akiner, Shirin (2004). The politicization of Islam in Central Asia in the post-Soviet period. Translated by Saeed Naghizadeh, Quarterly Journal of Central Asian and Caucasian Studies, 12 (45), pp. 113-160.(in Persian)
5.Al-Khatlan, Saleh (1999). Saudi Arabia's relations with Central Asian countries and the Caucasus. Journal of Central Asian and Caucasian Studies, (25), pp. 41-56.(in Persian)
6.Anvari, Hassan. (2002). Great culture of speech. Tehran: Sokhan.(in Persian)
7.Aras, Bulent; Kaha, Omar (2002). Liberal Islamic Movement in Turkey; Concepts of Fethullah Gulen. Translated by Seyyed Assadollah Athari, Quarterly Journal of Middle East Studies, (32), pp. 59-82.(in Persian)
8.Asen, Muammar (2013). The political and ideological dimensions of Takfir discourse. Translated by Mohammad Ghousheh Balagh, Siraj Munir, (10), pp. 126-107.(in Persian)
9.Betty, Robin; Shell, Bratson (2000). The ambiguous signs of NATO and the Caucasus and Central Asia. Studies of Central Asia and the Caucasus, (32), pp. 109-138.(in Persian)
10.  Bozan, Bari. (2009). Areas and powers. Translated by Rahman Ghahremanpour, Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies.(in Persian)
24.  Buzan,B(2003), "Regional Security Complex Theory in the Post-Cold War World" in Theories of New Regionalism. International Political Enonomy Series, Macmillan, London.
25.  Cheterian,Vicken, (Marcg 2005), <Torn between Nationalists and Islamist: Central Asia a Five Fragile States>, Le Monde Diplomatique.
26.  Graham E, Fuller and Jan O.Lesser, (1993) Yurkeys New Go Politic From The Balkans to Wetern China, (Sanfrancisno: Westview Press, 1993, p 45
27.  International Crisis Group(2003), Is Radical Islam Inevitable in Central Asia? Priorities for Engagement, ICG Asia Report N 72, 22 December 2003.
28.  Keating,Michael(2009), The Political Economic of Regionalism, Rutledge.
11.  Kolaei, Elahe (A) (2005). Fields of Islamic Fundamentalism in Central Asia. Faculty of Law and Political Science, (67), pp .201-224.(in Persian)
12.  Kolaei, Elahe; Kavianifar, Peyman; Rawa, Sara (2019). Iran and Turkey in Central Asian security complexes. Journal of International Relations Studies, 12 (45), pp. 141-170.(in Persian)
13.  Korani, Ali (2014). Saudi Wahhabism and ISIS in an interview with Ayatollah Korani. Wahhabi Critique Research Journal; Siraj Munir, 4 (15), pp. 9-26.(in Persian)
14.  McCain Lai, Robert; Little, Richard. (2001). Global security; Theories and approaches. Translated by Asghar Eftekhari, Tehran: Strategic Studies Research Institute Publications.(in Persian)
15.  Mohkamof (1996). Central Asia in regional cooperation. Translated by Afsoon Ghanizadeh, Studies in Central Asia and the Caucasus, (16), pp. 171-186.(in Persian)
16.  Mustafa, Hassan. (2015). ISIS; Epistemological and structural infrastructure. Tehran: Aftab Kherad Cultural and Artistic Institute.(in Persian)
17.  Naqdi‌nejad, Hassan; Pourabrahim, Nasser (2009). A Study of Turkey's Policies in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Studies of Central Asia and the Caucasus, (68), pp. 33-57.(in Persian)
18.  Rashid, Ahmad. (2008). Jihad; Islamic fighter in Central Asia. Translated by Jamal Aram, Tehran: Erfan.(in Persian)
29.  Rashid,Ahmad(2001), Jihad: The Rise of Militant in Central Asia, Penguine Book.
30.  Rashid,Ahmed(2002), Jihad: the Rise of Militant Islam in Central Asia, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
19.  Rifat, Seyed Ahmad. (1991). The Prophet's weapon (a). London: Riyadh Al-Ris Library and Publishing.(in Persian)
20.  Rose Ibaf, Helen. (2016). Gulen movement. Translated by Firoozeh Darshti, Qom: University of Religions and Denomination.(in Persian)
21.  Score, Michael (2006). Central Asia and Al Qaeda's anti-American view. Translated by Qassem Maleki, Quarterly Journal of Central Asian and Caucasian Studies, (54), pp. 187-194.(in Persian)
31.  Stobdan,P(2014), ISIS in Central Asia, Institute For Defsnce Studies&Analyses.
22.  Timurpour, Noushin (2009). Strategy of the Justice and Development Party in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Strategic Studies of the Islamic World, (39), pp. 183-206.(in Persian)
23.  Toloui, Mahmoud. (2011). Comprehensive political culture. Tehran: Nasr ILM (Science Publishing) .(in Persian)
 
    • Article View: 793
    • PDF Download: 909
Political studies of Islamic world
Volume 9, Issue 1 - Serial Number 33
June 2020
Pages 1-19
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 739.18 K
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 793
  • PDF Download: 909

APA

Mirali, M. and Shafaee, A. (2020). A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Turkey and Saudi Arabia in the Growth of Takfiri Extremism in Central Asia after 1991. Political studies of Islamic world, 9(1), 1-19. doi: 10.30479/psiw.2020.12326.2693

MLA

Mirali, M. , and Shafaee, A. . "A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Turkey and Saudi Arabia in the Growth of Takfiri Extremism in Central Asia after 1991", Political studies of Islamic world, 9, 1, 2020, 1-19. doi: 10.30479/psiw.2020.12326.2693

HARVARD

Mirali, M., Shafaee, A. (2020). 'A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Turkey and Saudi Arabia in the Growth of Takfiri Extremism in Central Asia after 1991', Political studies of Islamic world, 9(1), pp. 1-19. doi: 10.30479/psiw.2020.12326.2693

CHICAGO

M. Mirali and A. Shafaee, "A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Turkey and Saudi Arabia in the Growth of Takfiri Extremism in Central Asia after 1991," Political studies of Islamic world, 9 1 (2020): 1-19, doi: 10.30479/psiw.2020.12326.2693

VANCOUVER

Mirali, M., Shafaee, A. A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Turkey and Saudi Arabia in the Growth of Takfiri Extremism in Central Asia after 1991. Political studies of Islamic world, 2020; 9(1): 1-19. doi: 10.30479/psiw.2020.12326.2693

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

 

   The Political Studies of Islamic World is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC) .

 

 

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb