Abstract

After 50 years of authoritarian discourse Mubarak regime, people were able to challenge the hegemony of discourse. With the fall of the Mubarak regime, the Muslim Brotherhood Islamists took power. One year later, Islamism Brotherhood because the lack of understanding political and economic conditions and ,focus on knowledge eclectic, Lack of evidence as the leadership of Imam Khomeini lead, A sign of the supreme leader, And the inability to control of the power structure, such as former army and security forces,could Not maintain its sovereignty in the political arena in the political developments in Egypt 2012-2013 Egypt. In the face of political crises, economic and social failed and went to the sidelines. These developments led to restlessness discourse and discourse context for the emergence of rival though the coup was provided. . The real question is what caused the discourse of Islamist Muslim Brotherhood failed to provide context for the emergence of secular discourse. Muslim Brotherhood could not articulation of signifiers around the central slab, their hegemonic discourse and his good sense of the community in mind stabilize. This paper uses the theory of "discourse" to prove the hypothesis test.